![]() ![]() Probably it could be a sign that the person can become a judge or advocate if there are more composite prints on hand. from that point of view it should not bbe considered under classifcation of loops. able to see mutliple thinghs, which is why decision making becomes difficult for compsoite patterns, if there are more composite patterns in hand then they can face diifciulty in decision making because they are able to see other side of life, other view point ect. ![]() It is sufficiently common that it can be considered a fingerprint pattern in its own right. However, the most common form of this variant pattern is the 'double loop', so-named because it is made up of two loops, inter-twining in the opposite direction and when you look at it, it looks very much like a yin-yang symbol. No, of course not - what it is depends on the shape/features or patterns of the print itself. What does that mean? Does it mean it is a whorl-loop? (two triradii + one triradius, according to the Galton system). Sometimes, rarely, you can even find composite fingerprint patterns with three tri-radii. But that does not mean it is a whorl - nor does it mean it is even related to a whorl! Since the Galton et al system simplistically classifies fingerprints according to the number of triradii they have, obviously they classify it as a whorl. Yes, well that is why it is correctly termed a 'composite pattern', because it is composed of one or more patterns - and I agree with you that the more precise significance of the composite pattern will depend on what it is composed of.Īnd, once you accept it is a composite pattern, then the number of tridadii it has being the same as whorls does not matter being composed of two loops means it will have two triradii. Hello christopher as patti has mentioned can there be a new topic started for this for having a detailed discussion, iam very much interested in understnading about this print. If it has be two loops pulling in opposite direction then there should be no spiralling of loop (should not have C kind of curve). where one both half curls in different directions but these two halfs are connected. ALso it can it be taken as a circle split into half due to some reason. But it looks like one is the miror of the other that does not mean they are conflicting can it mean somethingh else like what patti mentioned able to look from having multidirectional apperance. But conflict in thought patterns arises only when there is a division, but in composite there is no division of loops, they are interlinked or interwined and also if you look it is not that simple as what we think of loops in opposite direction(Patti mentioned this also). Iam able to understand all other interpretation but not composite prints partly because it comes under the fbi rules as a whorl classification and partly based on palmistry interpretation. Then don't you think we have to look whether two loops form double loops or it is coming in as one single pattern. ![]() I would prefer to categorize them in the whorl group, one because of the two (or more) triradii and secondly because the pattern itself gives a more multidirectional appearance in the ridges than the plain loop or arch. Personally I think there is more to it than being pulled in opposite directions. When you take a close look at some double loops you can see the loops come in from both ulnar and radial sides and other times the loops enter from the same side and then other times it is one big loop that folds over or makes an S pattern (all with two triradii). The concept of "pulled in conflicting directions" is interesting. We have had some discussions here previously about the double loops and their classification. I too hope that you would expound a bit on this. Just there are two of them, so they get pulled in conflicting directions! Having two tri-radii means strictly speaking it could be either - but I class it as a type of loop because the psychological traits of those with double loops are more akin to loops than they are to whorl-types. Regarding 'double loops', I don't take these as a type of whorl, even though the standard dg classification does. » Stewart Culin - Palmistry in China and Japan » VIII - Palmistry books TOP 100 - listed by 'Amazon Sales Rank'! ![]() » clinodactyly: top phalanges bending towards Mercury finger ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |